Monday, November 23, 2015
Criteria D- Evaluating of the solution
Reflection for criteria A:
Reflection for research on printers:
What I did? (What did you do to finish your project)
I researched about the most known and used printers. This took me quite a long time because I kept on wanting to add more to my work, but eventually I was satisfied with my work.
What I enjoyed? (Write about what you liked most in the project)
I really enjoyed learning more about printers because that would be very useful in real life in the modern world because almost everything is digital and printed.
What I found difficult?( Write about any part of the project that you found hard to do?)
The hard part of this task was cross-referencing the information to make sure I have the correct information because it took quite a long time.
What really worked?(Write about any part that you thought worked well)
I think the part that really worked well was the images because they really portrayed the information that was written.
Next Time (Write about what you would do differently next time)
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
Criteria C – Creation of the solution
My Design:
\
I followed the sketch and made no changes to the creation.
Creation Reflection:
What I did? (What did you do to finish your project)
To finish the creation I had to research images on the Parthenon (which was my inspiration) and I also had to see a few other TinkerCAD creations of another creation of a temple and see what I could improve.
What I enjoyed? (Write about what you liked most in the project)
The thing I really enjoyed about creating the creation was the freedom of expanding my creativity.
What I found difficult?( Write about any part of the project that you found hard to do?)
The thing I found hard was the placement of the shapes on TInkerCAD but after a few minutes I got the hang of it.
What really worked?(Write about any part that you thought worked well)
The thing that I figure really worked well was the finished production and the overall presentation of the creation.
Next Time (Write about what you would do differently next time)
If I do get a chance to repeat the process of creating this object, I would try to take my time and not rush with the making of this creation.
Criteria B – Developing Ideas
Design Specification:
Aesthetics
|
Colour suggested to be a mellow cream colour but could any colour of choice. Should be made from wood. Should be smoothed out with sand paper. Needs to be able to stand straight.
|
Cost
|
Should not cost more than 100 DHS ($27.23 US Dollars). Should cost at least 30 DHS ($5.45 US Dollars).
|
Customer
|
Made for collectors and people who appreciate architectural pieces or relics. Available for any age group and gender. Regarding the social-economic background most people would be able to get this object.
|
Environmental considerations
|
The impact the temple would make would be educational. The design would indirectly affect the environment.
|
Function
|
It must be an object to observe. Its purpose is to be educational. The product should be stored on a table or a flat surface. It can be used in school or an educational environment.
|
Manufacturing
|
Time needed: 1-3 Hours to build, 24 hours for glue to dry. In total around a day and a half. (Make sure to let glue dry fully before doing anything else). No software would be needed. There are no limitations to the creation of this project.
|
Materials
|
Tools needed: A Knife, Wood, Mellow Cream Paint, Wood Glue, Sand Paper.
|
Safety
|
Parent supervision advised.
|
Size
|
Size should be around 30 cm high.First layer of ground- 30 cm high, 3 cm wide and 5 cm thick. Second layer of ground- 20 cm high, 3 cm wide and 5 cm long. Pillars (4) -round- 10 cm long and 3 cm thick. Roof- 5 cm high and 20 cm long.
|
Hand- Drawn Design Sketches
Design Justification:
I have chosen the first design because it is simple yet elegant. On the first design I has only two floors but the second design has three and I think the smaller the design is the better. Both are the same colour which is Mello cream. The sizes are different making the first design smaller and the second bigger. The reason I think that the bigger the design is the better is because this is supposed to be admired and I think that people would appreciate it more if it was travel size and easy to carry. These are the reasons why I have chosen my first design. As for the design I have done on TinkerCAD, I followed all the measurements in my drawing design that I have chosen.
http://www.visitgreece.gr/en/culture/monuments/parthenon |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)